Sponsored Links
-->

Wednesday, May 9, 2018

Cross Border Jurisdictional Questions |
src: www.mackesysmye.com

Amchem Products Inc v British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 897 is a leading decision on forum non conveniens by the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court overturned an anti-suit injunction issued by the British Columbia Supreme Court against the courts in Texas on the basis that the British Columbia (BC) court was not necessarily the better forum for the case.


Video Amchem Products Inc v British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board)



Background

A number of BC residents began an action against several US manufacturers of asbestos in Texas. The Texas court accepted jurisdiction over the matter and heard the case. The manufacturers applied to the BC Supreme Court to issue an anti-suit injunction, arguing that the proper forum for the plaintiffs would be in BC and not Texas.

The BC Supreme Court issued the injunction. In response, Texas issued an "anti-anti-suit injunction". The BC Supreme Court judgment was upheld on appeal to the BC Court of Appeal.


Maps Amchem Products Inc v British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board)



Ruling of the Court

The Supreme Court of Canada overturned the judgment and found that there was insufficient grounds to deny Texas jurisdiction.

The Court adopts the test for forum non conveniens from Spiliada Maritime Corp. v. Cansulex Ltd., [1987] A.C. 460


Cross Border Jurisdictional Questions |
src: www.mackesysmye.com


See also

  • List of Supreme Court of Canada cases
  • Morguard Investments Ltd. v. De Savoye, (1990)

Adam Kessel - Attorney, Boston | Fish
src: www.fr.com


References


Cross Border Jurisdictional Questions |
src: www.mackesysmye.com


External links

  • Full text of Supreme Court of Canada decision at LexUM and CanLII

Source of the article : Wikipedia

Comments
0 Comments