Sponsored Links
-->

Saturday, July 14, 2018

National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp ...
src: i.ytimg.com

National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, 301 U.S. 1 (1937), was a US labor law case in the United States Supreme Court that declared that the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 (commonly known as the Wagner Act) was constitutional. It effectively spelled the end to the Court's striking down of New Deal economic legislation, and greatly increased Congress's power under the Commerce Clause.


Video NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.



Background

Jones & Laughlin Steel was America's fourth largest steel producer and the charges brought against it were that the company discriminated against workers who wanted to join the Steel Workers Organizing Committee (SWOC). The company had fired ten employees at its plant in Aliquippa, Pennsylvania after they moved to unionize. The NLRB ruled against the company and ordered the workers be rehired and given back pay, but Jones & Laughlin refused to comply on the grounds that they believed the act was unconstitutional. Citing Supreme Court precedent, lower courts agreed.


Maps NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.



Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes wrote the majority opinion in the case, which reversed the lower court's ruling, in a 5-4 decision: "Although activities may be intrastate in character when separately considered, if they have such a close and substantial relation to interstate commerce that their control is essential or appropriate to protect that commerce from burdens and obstructions, Congress cannot be denied the power to exercise that control."

Dissenting opinion of Justice McReynolds

Justice McReynolds questioned Congress's enhanced power under the commerce clause. Although he did not dispute Congress's regulation of interstate commerce between the states, he stated that Congress's interference should be in cases where a violation is "direct and material." As an example McReynolds stated that taxation on property may indirectly, but seriously, affect the cost of transportation. In conclusion, he stated that Congress had transcended the power granted to it by the Constitution.


Archives | Josh Blackman's Blog
src: joshblackman.com


See also

  • US labor law
  • List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 301

Archives | Josh Blackman's Blog
src: joshblackman.com


References


News and Legal Updates รข€
src: static1.squarespace.com


Further reading

  • Tushnet, Mark (2008). I dissent: Great Opposing Opinions in Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Boston: Beacon Press. pp. 101-112. ISBN 978-0-8070-0036-6. 

Change Conway/XPO To Win: 2018
src: 2.bp.blogspot.com


External links

  • Works related to NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. at Wikisource
  • Text of National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, 301 U.S. 1 (1937) is available from:  Cornell  CourtListener  Google Scholar  Justia  Oyez 
  • Case Brief for NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. at Lawnix.com

Source of the article : Wikipedia

Comments
0 Comments